Privacy regulators and plaintiffs' law firms scan business websites for one pattern: tracking tools that fire before the visitor consents. Enter your domain and I'll run the same check on yours.
The full audit tests your site in a live browser: what fires before consent, what ignores a decline, what your privacy policy claims versus what actually runs, and the exact fixes with effort estimates. You get it as a PDF in your inbox, written so your own team or web developer can make the fixes. We don't sell web services; the audit is the product.
Your full audit is in the queue. It lands in your inbox within one business day.
We load your site in a clean browser with no consent given and record every cookie set and every third-party host contacted. This catches trackers hidden inside tag managers.
We click Decline and keep browsing. Tools that keep tracking after a decline are the finding that matters most.
Your privacy policy compared against what actually runs. We flag tools it doesn't mention, and claims your site doesn't keep.
Every gap gets a fix, an effort estimate, and a cost. Most fixes use tools you already own and cost nothing but configuration time.
I'm Grant Leishman. Thirty years running real businesses, accountant by training, two exits. I built this check after a compliance-scare email landed in my own inbox. The claim in that email turned out to be true, and the fix took a few hours and cost nothing. Most businesses are in exactly that position: a real gap, a cheap fix, and a salesperson trying to charge two weeks for it.